Changelog History
Page 1
-
v7.3.1
November 11, 2020 -
v7.3.0 Changes
September 19, 2020🆕 New Demo app
⏪ The old CoreStoreDemo app has been renamed to LegacyDemo, and a new Demo app now showcases CoreStore features through SwiftUI:
Don't worry, standard UIKit samples are also available (thanks to
UIViewControllerRepresentable)🆓 Feel free to suggest improvements to the Demo app!
👍 Swift 5.3 / Xcode 12 / iOS 14 Support
⏪ CoreStore now compiles using Xcode 12 and Swift 5.3!
⏪ ⚠️ There was a bug in Swift 5.3
propertyWrapperswhere Segmentation Faults happen during compile time. CoreStore was able to work around this issue through runtimefatalErrors, but the result is that missing required parameters for@Fieldproperties may not be caught during compile-time. The runtime checks crash if there are missing parameters, so please take care to debug your models! -
v7.2.0 Changes
June 20, 20200️⃣ Default values vs. Initial values
⏪ One common mistake when assigning default values to
CoreStoreObjectproperties is to assign it a value and expect it to be evaluated whenever an object is created:// ❌class Person: CoreStoreObject { @Field.Stored("identifier") var identifier: UUID = UUID() // Wrong!@Field.Stored("createdDate") var createdDate: Date = Date() // Wrong!}0️⃣ This default value will be evaluated only when the
DataStacksets up the schema, and all instances will end up having the same values. This syntax for "default values" are usually used only for actual reasonable constant values, or sentinel values such as""or0.👍 For actual "initial values",
@Field.Storedand@Field.Codednow supports dynamic evaluation during object creation via thedynamicInitialValue:argument:// ✅class Person: CoreStoreObject { @Field.Stored("identifier", dynamicInitialValue: { UUID() }) var identifier: UUID @Field.Stored("createdDate", dynamicInitialValue: { Date() }) var createdDate: Date }0️⃣ When using this feature, a "default value" should not be assigned (i.e. no
=expression). -
v7.1.0 Changes
March 27, 2020⚡️ Maintenance updates
- 👍 Xcode 11.4 and Swift 5.2 support
🆕 New Property Wrappers syntax
⏪ ⚠️ These changes apply only to
CoreStoreObjectsubclasses, notNSManagedObjects.🍱 ‼️ Please take note of the warnings below before migrating or else the model's hash might change.
👍 If conversion is too risky, the current
Value.Required,Value.Optional,Transformable.Required,Transformable.Optional,Relationship.ToOne,Relationship.ToManyOrdered, andRelationship.ToManyUnorderedwill all be supported for while so you can opt to use them as is for now.🍱 ‼️ If you are confident about conversion, I cannot stress this enough, but please make sure to set your schema's
VersionLockbefore converting!@Field.Stored(replacement for non "transient"Value.RequiredandValue.Optional)class Person: CoreStoreObject { @Field.Stored("title") var title: String = "Mr."@Field.Stored("nickname") var nickname: String?}🍱 ⚠️ Only
Value.RequiredandValue.Optionalthat are NOT transient values can be converted toField.Stored.
🍱 ⚠️ When converting, make sure that all parameters, including the default values, are exactly the same or else the model's hash might change.@Field.Virtual(replacement for "transient" versions ofValue.RequiredandValue.Optional)class Animal: CoreStoreObject { @Field.Virtual( "pluralName", customGetter: { (object, field) inreturn object.$species.value + "s" } ) var pluralName: String@Field.Stored("species") var species: String = ""}🍱 ⚠️ Only
Value.RequiredandValue.Optionalthat ARE transient values can be converted toField.Virtual.
🍱 ⚠️ When converting, make sure that all parameters, including the default values, are exactly the same or else the model's hash might change.👍
@Field.Coded(replacement forTransformable.RequiredandTransformable.Optional, with additional support for custom encoders such as JSON)class Person: CoreStoreObject { @Field.Coded( "bloodType", coder: { encode: { $0.toData() }, decode: { BloodType(fromData: $0) } } ) var bloodType: BloodType?}🍱 ‼️ The current
Transformable.RequiredandTransformable.Optionalmechanism have no safe conversion to@Field.Coded. Please use@Field.Codedonly for newly added attributes.@Field.Relationship(replacement forRelationship.ToOne,Relationship.ToManyOrdered, andRelationship.ToManyUnordered)class Pet: CoreStoreObject { @Field.Relationship("master") var master: Person?}class Person: CoreStoreObject { @Field.Relationship("pets", inverse: \.$master) var pets: Set\<Pet\>}🍱 ⚠️
Relationship.ToOne<T>maps toT?,Relationship.ToManyOrderedmaps toArray<T>, andRelationship.ToManyUnorderedmaps toSet<T>
🍱 ⚠️ When converting, make sure that all parameters, including the default values, are exactly the same or else the model's hash might change.Usage
Before diving into the properties themselves, note that they will effectively force you to use a different syntax for queries:
- Before:
From<Person>.where(\.title == "Mr.") - After:
From<Person>.where(\.$title == "Mr.")
There are a several advantages to using these Property Wrappers:
- 👀 The
@propertyWrapperversions will be magnitudes performant and efficient than their current implementations. CurrentlyMirrorreflection is used a lot to inject theNSManagedObjectreference into the properties. With@propertyWrappers this will be synthesized by the compiler for us. (See apple/swift#25884) - The
@propertyWrapperversions, beingstructs, will give the compiler a lot more room for optimizations which were not possible before due to the need for mutable classes. - You can now add computed properties that are accessible to both
ObjectSnapshots andObjectPublishers by declaring them as@Field.Virtual. Note that forObjectSnapshots, the computed values are evaluated only once during creation and are not recomputed afterwards.
The only disadvantage will be:
- ⚡️ You need to update your code by hand to migrate to the new
@propertyWrappers
(But the legacy ones will remain available for quite a while, so while it is recommended to migrate soon, no need to panic)
-
v7.0.4
February 07, 2020 -
v7.0.3
January 08, 2020 -
v7.0.2
December 23, 2019 -
v7.0.1
October 25, 2019 -
v7.0.0 Changes
October 22, 2019⚡️ ⚠️This update will break current code. Make sure to read the changes below:
💥 Breaking Changes
🚀 Starting version
7.0.0, CoreStore will be using a lot of Swift 5.1 features, both internally and in its public API. You can keep using the last6.3.2release if you still need Swift 5.0.🗄 Deprecations
⏪ The
CoreStore-namespaced API has been deprecated in favor ofDataStackmethod calls. If you are using the global utilities such asCoreStore.defaultStackandCoreStore.logger, a newCoreStoreDefaultsnamespace has been provided:- ⏪
CoreStore.defaultStack->CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack - ⏪
CoreStore.logger->CoreStoreDefaults.logger - ⏪
CoreStore.addStorage(...)->CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack.addStorage(...) - ⏪
CoreStore.fetchAll(...)->CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack.fetchAll(...) - etc.
If you have been using your own properties to store
DataStackreferences, then you should not be affected by this change.🆕 New features
Backwards-portable DiffableDataSources implementation
UITableViewsandUICollectionViewsnow have a new ally:ListPublishers provide diffable snapshots that make reloading animations very easy and very safe. Say goodbye toUITableViewsandUICollectionViewsreload errors!🍎 DiffableDataSource.CollectionView (iOS and macOS) and DiffableDataSource.TableView (iOS)
self.dataSource = DiffableDataSource.CollectionView\<Person\>( collectionView: self.collectionView, dataStack: CoreStoreDefaults.dataStack, cellProvider: { (collectionView, indexPath, person) inlet cell = collectionView.dequeueReusableCell(withReuseIdentifier: "PersonCell") as! PersonCell cell.setPerson(person) return cell } )⚡️ This is now the recommended method of reloading
UITableViews andUICollectionViews because it uses list diffing to update your list views. This means that it is a lot less prone to cause layout errors.ListPublisher and ListSnapshot
⚡️
ListPublisheris a more lightweight counterpart ofListMonitor. UnlikeListMonitor, it does not keep track of minute inserts, deletes, moves, and updates. It simply updates itssnapshotproperty which is astructstoring the list state at a specific point in time. ThisListSnapshotis then usable with theDiffableDataSourceutilities (See section above).self.listPublisher = dataStack.listPublisher( From\<Person\>() .sectionBy(\.age") { "Age \($0)" } // sections are optional .where(\.title == "Engineer") .orderBy(.ascending(\.lastName)))self.listPublisher.addObserver(self) { [weak self] (listPublisher) in self?.dataSource?.apply( listPublisher.snapshot, animatingDifferences: true )}ListSnapshots store onlyNSManagedObjectIDs and their sections.ObjectPublisher and ObjectSnapshot
ObjectPublisheris a more lightweight counterpart ofObjectMonitor. UnlikeObjectMonitor, it does not keep track of per-property changes. You can create anObjectPublisherfrom the object directly:let objectPublisher: ObjectPublisher\<Person\> = person.asPublisher(in: dataStack)or by indexing a
ListPublisher'sListSnapshot:let objectPublisher = self.listPublisher.snapshot[indexPath]The
ObjectPublisherexposes asnapshotproperty which returns anObjectSnapshot, which is a lazily generatedstructcontaining fully-copied property values.objectPublisher.addObserver(self) { [weak self] (objectPublisher) inlet snapshot: ObjectSnapshot\<Person\> = objectPublisher.snapshot// handle changes}This snapshot is completely thread-safe, and any mutations to it will not affect the actual object.
Intent-based Object representations
⏪ CoreStore is slowly moving to abstract object utilities based on usage intent.
⏪NSManageObject',CoreStoreObject,ObjectPublisher, andObjectSnapshotall conform to theObjectRepresentation` protocol, which allows conversion of each type to another:public protocol ObjectRepresentation { associatedtype ObjectType : CoreStore.DynamicObjectfunc objectID() -\> ObjectType.ObjectID func asPublisher(in dataStack: DataStack) -\> ObjectPublisher\<ObjectType\> func asReadOnly(in dataStack: DataStack) -\> ObjectType?func asEditable(in transaction: BaseDataTransaction) -\> ObjectType?func asSnapshot(in dataStack: DataStack) -\> ObjectSnapshot\<ObjectType\>?func asSnapshot(in transaction: BaseDataTransaction) -\> ObjectSnapshot\<ObjectType\>?}ObjectMonitorbeing excluded in this family was intentional; its initialization is complex enough to be an API of its own. - ⏪
-
v6.3.2
August 27, 2019
